.png)
J is for Judgement-free teamwork
- May 22
- 4 min read
Welcome! This article is part of an A–Z series where I’m sharing reflections on the patterns I keep seeing in teams, leadership and workplace culture.
Not theory. Not tips. Just observations from real working life.
If I had to pick one thing that quietly drains energy from teams, it’s not lack of skill, or even lack of effort. It’s judgement.
Not the dramatic, obvious kind. The subtle kind that creeps into everyday interpretations of behaviour.
Most of the time, friction in teams doesn’t come from people being “difficult.” It comes from people being different - and those differences being misread.
What I see happening in teams
This is how it often plays out in real life:
One person is “too slow”… another is simply being thorough
One person is “too blunt”… another is just being clear
One person is “overthinking”… another is scanning for risk
One person is “not engaged”… another is processing internally
None of those interpretations are malicious. They’re just fast, automatic judgements we make when we don’t pause to understand intent.
The problem is, once those labels stick - even informally - they start shaping how people relate to each other.
Small differences in working style become personality assumptions. And those assumptions quietly build tension that doesn’t really belong to the task at hand.
I’ve seen teams where the actual work is fine… but the emotional load of “how we think about each other” is what makes everything feel heavy.
the impact is bigger than many organisations realise. According to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace research, low engagement and poor workplace experiences cost the global economy trillions every year - and UK employee engagement levels continue to sit below the global best-performing regions. In practice, that often appears not through dramatic conflict, but through withdrawal, hesitation, misunderstanding, and people feeling psychologically unsafe to contribute fully.
In the UK specifically, research from the CIPD has consistently shown that relationship quality at work is one of the strongest predictors of well-being, job satisfaction, and retention. Teams don’t usually fall apart because people lack technical capability. More often, strain builds because communication styles and intentions are repeatedly misinterpreted.
The hidden cost of judgement
When judgement becomes the default lens, a few things start to happen:
Intent gets assumed instead of checked
Behaviour gets personalised rather than understood
Frustration builds in the background, unspoken but present
People start adapting their behaviour defensively, not naturally
Collaboration becomes more cautious and less open
Here’s something I find really interesting: Most teams don’t realise this is happening until it’s already affecting performance.
There’s research in organisational psychology that shows misunderstandings based on attribution errors (basically, misreading someone’s behaviour as a personality trait rather than a context or preference) are one of the most common drivers of workplace conflict. It’s not big dramatic events - it’s these small, repeated misinterpretations.
The UK Health and Safety Executive estimates that work-related stress, depression, and anxiety account for millions of lost working days every year across Britain. While workload and pressure are obvious contributors, interpersonal strain and poor workplace relationships are consistently part of the picture too.
And according to studies on psychological safety popularised by Google’s Project Aristotle, the highest-performing teams were not the ones with the smartest individuals, but the teams where people felt safest to speak openly, ask questions, admit mistakes, and contribute without fear of embarrassment or judgement.
Left unchecked, these patterns don’t just slow work down. They start to erode trust.
What changes when judgement drops
When teams begin to consciously separate behaviour from intent, the atmosphere shifts quite quickly.
You start to notice:
Differences stop being seen as “problems to fix”
Curiosity replaces assumption (“I wonder why they’re approaching it that way?”)
Conversations become less reactive and more thoughtful
Misunderstandings get cleared up earlier, before they grow legs
Focus shifts back to outcomes instead of personalities
Trust strengthens, not because everyone is the same, but because differences are respected
This is where it gets powerful: people don’t need to change who they are. They just need to stop being misread.
For me, this is the real shift:
Most tension in teams isn’t about people not getting along. It’s about people not recognising that others are simply operating differently.
When that clicks, everything softens a bit. Not because the differences disappear, but because they stop being treated as threats.
And once judgement steps back, something much better has space to step forward: clearer communication, easier collaboration, and a lot less unnecessary friction.
That’s the kind of teamwork I’m always trying to build with Insights Discovery - not perfect harmony, but better understanding of the differences that are already there.
If this resonated, it’s probably because you’re seeing it too.
Philippa x
Want to see more?
Follow me on LinkedIn →
Interested in finding out more?
I offer:
1:1 packages for business owners
Insights Discovery Sessions like Team Effectiveness and Leadership Effectiveness
Consultancy for businesses who want to create healthy workplace culture
