.png)
I is for Inclusion of every voice in the room
- May 11
- 3 min read
Welcome! This article is part of an A–Z series where I’m sharing reflections on the patterns I keep seeing in teams, leadership and workplace culture.
Not theory. Not tips. Just observations from real working life.
I want to talk about something I see all the time when I work with teams, and it’s usually not intentional, but it makes a big difference to how decisions get made.
Loud voices dominate.
Quiet voices disappear.
Before anyone panics - this isn’t about “bad meetings” or “bad managers.” It’s just human group dynamics doing what they do when we don’t actively shape them.
In this part of my A–Z of Insights Discovery, I is for Inclusion of every voice in the room.
What I notice happening in teams
When I step into organisations, I often see a familiar pattern:
The most confident voices tend to set the direction of the conversation
Fast thinkers naturally steer the pace
People who process internally often contribute less in real time
Silence gets mistaken for agreement
By the time quieter voices are ready to speak, the group has already moved on
Here’s the tricky bit: it can all look perfectly “fine” on the surface. Everyone is present. The meeting is happening. Decisions are being made. But underneath, something important is missing.
The hidden cost of unbalanced participation
Research into workplace communication consistently shows that a small number of participants often dominate group discussions. In some studies of meeting behaviour, a handful of individuals can account for over half of the speaking time, even in fairly balanced teams.
And Gallup-style engagement research has repeatedly shown that many employees don’t feel fully comfortable speaking up in group settings - often only a minority consistently do so without hesitation.
So what does that actually mean in real life?
It means:
We risk confusing silence with agreement
We miss out on more reflective, analytical thinking
We prioritise speed over depth without realising it
We lose ideas that simply arrive later in someone’s thinking process
We sometimes make decisions without the full picture
I often say to teams: the conversation you had is not always the intelligence you had in the room.
What shifts when inclusion is intentional
This is where things get really interesting for me. When teams start to deliberately create space for different thinking styles - not just louder or faster ones - the energy in the room changes quite quickly.
You start to see:
More perspectives being spoken, not just privately considered
Less “competition for airtime” and more genuine contribution
Ideas being built collaboratively rather than just reacted to
Quieter contributors becoming more visible in the thinking process
Leaders gaining a more accurate sense of alignment (rather than assuming it from silence)
Honestly, the quality of decision-making improves. Not because people suddenly become “better at meetings,” but because the group starts accessing more of its collective intelligence.
For me, this is the heart of it:
Inclusion isn’t about who is in the room. It’s about how the room works.
When participation is left to chance, the same patterns tend to repeat themselves. When it’s structured with intention, something shifts - subtly at first, then very clearly over time.
The room stops being a space where a few voices carry the conversation.
And it becomes a space where more of the thinking gets heard.
That’s what I’m always aiming for when I work with teams using Insights Discovery: not louder meetings, not longer meetings, but fairer access to the intelligence that’s already there.
If this resonated, it’s probably because you’re seeing it too.
Philippa x
Want to see more?
Follow me on LinkedIn →
Interested in finding out more?
I offer:
1:1 packages for business owners
Insights Discovery Sessions like Team Effectiveness and Leadership Effectiveness
Consultancy for businesses who want to create healthy workplace culture
